Well, according to Radar it’s not; you see, all of its “glory” is gone. Indianapolis, on the other hand is chock full of glory. Fundamentalists are strange people indeed.

I’m also not sure how a world class city doesn’t have traffic. World-Class and heavy traffic seem pretty synonymous to me. What’s really tragic is he lives within 50 miles of Chicago, but he favors Indianapolis. That’s a shame, because Chicago is a fantastic city with global reach. Indianapolis is slightly safer than Chicago, but it’s nowhere near as safe as old no-more-glory.

He must think “Glory” means assaults.

I think I cracked his code.

3 Responses to “San Francisco is not world class”

  1. Dad Says:

    He sounds like a country bumkin making his first visit to a large city. Indy is at least a third or forth tier city. I would rather stay in Cleveland or move to San Francisco (a tier one city). If you are going to take a jump….do it right.

  2. scohen Says:

    Hey don’t be so mean to Radar, he lives fairly close to Chicago, and I’m sure he’s seen large cities, he just doesn’t like them if their politics differs from his.

  3. Dad Says:

    OK I take that back….. Sorry Radar…Indy will be a good choice for you. I will still take Cleveland or San Francisco.

Leave a Reply